MCTS Self-Paced Training Kit : Microsoft® .NET Framework Application Development Foundation, Second edition


Product Description
Your 2-in-1 Self-Paced Training Kit. Fully updated and revised! Ace your preparation for the skills measured by MCTS Exam 70-536—and on the job. With this official Microsoft study guide, you’ll work at your own pace through a series of lessons and reviews that fully cover each exam objective. Then reinforce and apply what you’ve learned through real-world case scenarios and practice exercises. Maximize your performance on the exam by learning to: Develop app… More >>

MCTS Self-Paced Training Kit : Microsoft® .NET Framework Application Development Foundation, Second edition

Tags: .NET, ace, application, application development, case scenarios, Development, development foundation, edition, exam objective, Foundation, Framework, job, MCTS, microsoft, microsoft net framework, Microsoft®, own pace, practice exercises, real world, Second, self paced training, SelfPaced, training, world case

Related posts

  1. #1 by J. Flurkey on January 29, 2010 - 9:30 pm

    So far so good, the code examples work and the author(s) cover a broad range of topics. As this point I am on chapter 9 and have not yet taken the exam so I cannot fully rate the benefits of this book.
    Rating: 3 / 5

  2. #2 by Robert V. Abrams III on January 30, 2010 - 12:18 am

    I have read the 2nd Edition of this book and have noticed too many errors from the get go. Anyone who is serious about passing the Application Development Foundation exam MUST cross-reference with MSDN. MSDN will cover the topics with a level of detail appropriate for having the skills to pass the exam.

    Hopefully, Northrup will get it right with a 3rd Edition, hence the title.
    Rating: 3 / 5

  3. #3 by infocyde on January 30, 2010 - 12:29 am

    The second edition may be better from the first, but I found an error on the review section in the first chapter. That doesn’t give me a lot of confidence in the book. I’ll go through it, but I’m going to have to double check everything in here. Microsoft needs to provide training materials that actually train you both to have adequate skills in the real world to succeed as well as past the test. I’m not sure this book does a great job of either, but it is one of the few resources available so we are stuck with it. Also put a freaken link to the errata section in an easily findable spot. If you *((^*% up your own book I at least want to find where an update is without having to hunt around the internet for it.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  4. #4 by Mark Bondurant on January 30, 2010 - 2:37 am

    “MCTS Self-Paced Training Kit (Exam 70-536): Microsoft® .NET Framework Application Development Foundation, Second Edition (Self-Paced Training Kits)” is a mostly successful attempt to correct the travesties of it’s occasionally apocryphal predecessor, “MCTS Self-Paced Training Kit (Exam 70-536): Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Application Development Foundation”. Northup seems to be to have ironed out most of the bugs. The book is still inadequate as a prep book for the test, but I think you can at least count on it as a useful guide and reference. Hey, it even has a proper index. It’s unusually good for a Microsoft Press book — who publish anything that can pass a spell checker.

    The test itself if a vast hodgepodge of .NET leftovers, a sort of dumping ground of subjects, with no single focus and a huge domain of subject material. The preceding book was over a thousand pages and was still inadequate in covering the material. Combine that with the usual lack of imagination and interest endemic of all MS certifications with questions like “pick the right method signature” or “find the block of code that doesn’t have a bug” and you have a test that achieves nothing, but foster bitterness and anger towards Microsoft. As with its predecessor, I think you will see a lot of that bitterness expressed in book reviews. In this case, the book really doesn’t deserve it. It may be a bit unimaginative, heck even boring, but it’s competently written.

    The book is not without humor, though it’s unintentional. Northup is a rabid advocate of regex functions. He never passes up an opportunity to work them in. To those of us who have experience outside of the Microsoft culture, this looks a bit like a Japanese man raised on rice wondering the American Mid-West evangelizing the wonders of wheat bread. I’ve seen a lot of this test and I’ve never seen a single question on regex. The new list of test requirements have added a single requirement for it and there may now be a question in there, but considering the vastness of the subject of regex itself and the appalling amount of useless material you have to memorize (that Microsoft will just dump or pave over in three years) for the test, that I think you can just sigh, roll your eyes and move on. It does also make a good example of the inherent weakness of the monoculture that Microsoft has created.

    One complaint that I’ve heard that I think is valid is that the author feels the need to teach the subjects. The book, and its predecessor, spent a lot of time explaining individual subjects. This is great and it does make the book useful. I know I will keep it handy. But it doesn’t help with the test, and you need all the help you can get with this one. I’ll be blunt — this test is bad, very bad — and the last thing you need is to be filling precious storage with non-useful information, at least non-useful as far as surviving the test. What good is learning these subjects if you can’t pass the test? The book needs to be one or the other.

    If you have to pick this or its predecessor, pick this one. Really, I think you will need both and then about 200 or 300 knowledge base articles. None of this material is adequately covered anywhere. [...].

    Rating: 4 / 5

  5. #5 by L. Cummins on January 30, 2010 - 3:14 am

    I had the previous version of this book, while a later release there were still a few errors here and there.

    Generally I would say if you are studying for this exam, then you should get this book.

    I did do a write up on my blog for this exam: [...]
    Rating: 4 / 5

Comments are closed.